Navigating the new learning map
Related content
Replies (3)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
Derek mentions the debate around the need for 'official' HR qualifications and quotes Benjamin Franklin's view on experience and theory. I'm sure this is an acceptable outlook for our hobbies and pastimes, although even there, we often want to follow experience with theory. It's not acceptable for a 21st Century profession with a growing body of knowledge around how people perform.
When I first started in HR I came across a number of people in the role simply because they were "good with people". Things have moved on significantly since then. I wouldn't hire an accountant simply because she's good with numbers, or an electrician simply because he's got years of wiring experience. We need to be proud of the theoretical knowledge on which we base our skills, and CIPD is absolutely right in upgrading this.
Thanks for your comment (and your regular comments and insight on other subjects too, it's much appreciated).
We have seen the experience v qualifications arguement on HRzone in the past which is why I thought it was an ideal time to ask someone like Derek about this.
I think everyone really values experience and I would agree that even those who started out in HR 'because they like people' need to consider their own development as well as that of their employees - wouldn't it be dreadful if HR because like the NHS, very good at looking after others but neglecting our own health? (Or has HR already become like that?)
There's clearly value in training and the new qualifications from CIPD, which Derek will be taking his clients through, will beneft from a closer industry experience and encouragement towards a more strategic and more agile way of thinking which is essential to HR today.
Thanks AJ for your comments; a timley reminder for me. And of course you are right. The "ounce of experience is worth a ton of theory" was a natty sound bite to get over the esesence of practitioner-level qualifications that I am deeply involved with just now.
I love theory and it has its place alongside our experience. Working all over I see the HR reputation fallout from too much theory being spoken to busy MDs and equally the disasters when frenetic operational delivery occurs in a strategic vacuum.
CIPD, I know from living with the standards, have it right. There is a mix of relevant content areas, theory, experience and assessments. I'm looking forward to facilitating the future participants on CIPD qualifications because its been such fun being involved at the start of a new set of standards.
As a final thought on my first ever HR Zone post, here is a model that will not make it onto our programme content.