No Image Available

Annie Hayes

Sift

Editor

Read more about Annie Hayes

Payroll Tip: Deduction for capital contributions towards a company car

pp_default1

These questions are being answered by Learn HR, a market leader in the provision of HR and payroll training and nationally-recognised professional qualifications.


Q: Does a payment to obtain a better car qualify as a capital contribution?

A: When an employee makes, or is required to make, a capital contribution to the purchase of a company car, some or all of that contributions may be offset against the list price of the car, thereby reducing the tax charge.

The amount by which the cash equivalent of the car is reduced by such a contribution is limited to the lesser of

  • any capital contributions made by the employee towards the expenditure on the provision of the car or any qualifying accessories, and
  • £5,000.

If a car is transferred from one driver to another, the reductions to which the first driver is entitled due to having made a capital contribution do not pass to the second driver.

In understanding the nature of a capital contribution, it must be noted that it is a contribution towards the “expenditure” on the car and accessories. The employee is paying, in part, for the car or the accessories. Consequently, the payment would be made at or about the time when the car or accessory is provided. The Revenue does not rule out an arrangement whereby a capital contribution could be made in instalments, perhaps by deduction through the payroll, but it is not consistent with the concept of a capital contribution.

Therefore, care must be taken not to confuse capital contributions with:

  • payments made by employees in respect of private “use” of the car, which reduce the value of the car benefit at the very end of the process, and
  • payments made by employees to obtain a better car than that to which they are normally entitled, often as a monthly deduction from salary, unless the payment is also specifically a capital contribution.

The terms on which the employee makes a capital contribution may provide that the employee is entitled, when the car is eventually sold to a third party, to be repaid the proportion of the capital contribution that the original contribution bears to the original cost of the car. (Such a repayment would not be subject to PAYE.)

However, if the agreement was that the employee would be repaid the full amount of the capital contribution, the employee would not be considered as having made a capital contribution in the first place.

Such a repayment agreement is not a requirement for there to have been a capital contribution. It is the capital nature of the original contribution that is critical, not any repayment arrangement. The fact that an employee is not entitled to any repayment when the car is sold does not in itself mean that the original payment was not a capital contribution.

View all our HR tips:

No Image Available
Annie Hayes

Editor

Read more from Annie Hayes
Newsletter

Get the latest from HRZone

Subscribe to expert insights on how to create a better workplace for both your business and its people.

 

Thank you.