New Equality Commission to fight discrimination
Related content
Replies (1)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
The Government’s proposals for a single equality body may lead to cuts in resources and the swamping of the interests of disabled people.
Disability discrimination is different. Other discrimination often relates to categories of people. In the case of disabled people, discrimination is often personal to the individual; it’s often about the failure to make the adjustments that he or she needs. So tackling the problem often requires expert knowledge of the particular impairment.
Expertise needed to tackle disability discrimination cases could be lost or diluted as a result of a merger.
The interests of disabled people could become swamped – as happened in New Zealand when a single body was created. Currently, it is required that half the members of the Disability Rights Commission are disabled. In the reforms, it’s vital that disabled people remain involved in decision-making.
But provided that the special knowledge and skills required for combating disability discrimination can be preserved in the single body’s structure, the introduction of the single equality body is to be welcomed.
The merger of the EOC, CRE, and DRC could also be used as an excuse for cost savings, leading to inadequate service provision. In Australia, for example, there was a 40% budget cut following a similar merger. The Government should give assurances about resources.
But a unified body could have advantages:
A single equality body will get a stronger media profile and political influence – that’s happened in other countries.
Employers and service providers would benefit from a single source of advice and a consistent approach.
A human rights based approach to equality could be successfully fostered.
The experience in Northern Ireland shows that the transition to a merged body needs to be planned with care.
A single Equality Act should be brought in at the same time – unified legislation to get rid of the present conflicts and anomalies, and provide everyone with consistent easy-to-follow standards.
Declan O’Dempsey, practising barrister at Cloisters.