Share this content
Office creep
Vasileios Economou/iStock

How can we better understand the 'office creep?'

6th Jun 2016
Share this content

There's so much rich insight coming out of the academic sector that HR professionals need to know. At Academics' Corner we feature the best HR researchers that tell you what they’ve found and what you need to do differently on the back of the research. Get connected to the academic sector through Academics’ Corner and make sure you never miss another piece of key research again. If you’re an academic with a relevant story, please get in touch on [email protected].

Every office has one.  He is the guy you dread being left alone with in the break room; the guy with whom an awkward one minute conversation seems to last an hour; the guy who hovers at the edge of the group during happy hour with a mysterious smile engraved on his face.

He doggedly (and unsuccessfully) asks his female coworkers out to lunch, and he may work in IT.  Even though you know very little about his private life, you just know that he engages in peculiar hobbies like taxidermy or collecting something. I am of course talking about the office “creep,” and the office creep is almost always a man rather than a woman.

If you are having trouble thinking of who the creep is at your workplace, it probably means that you are the guy.

What exactly is it that makes some people seem so creepy?

I recently did a study in which I tried to unearth the building blocks of this thing we call Creepiness. In an online survey, 1,341 people weighed in on a range of behaviors and characteristics that I thought might be important, and a paper based upon this study, co-authored with Sara Koehnke (one of my students), recently appeared in New Ideas in Psychology.

Everything we found was consistent with the idea that getting “creeped out” is an unpleasant emotional experience that occurs in situations where there is an ambiguity about threat.

This insightful and useful piece of content is available to members of our fantastic HR and business community. To read the full article please log into your existing account or alternatively register to join like-minded people from across the world, solving similar problems. Don’t worry, it’s free and won’t take long! :)

Hope you'll join us,

Jamie & Shonette

Register to access content now
Already have an account?

Replies (2)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

By Chris Woodman
07th Jun 2016 16:53

Hi Frank, generally I am fairly agnostic about these kinds of thought pieces or updates on research but I really felt uncomfortable with this article and feel the need to comment. Why? There are always people who are different and I remember at school that sometimes those people were bullied or ostracised by the group because they were a bit 'creepy'. The concept of a 'creep' is pretty derogatory and may reflect an individuals lack of social skills, emotional intelligence or maybe they are some where on an autism/aspergers scale. Who knows? Their difference or lack of self awareness maybe linked to the way that they were brought up and socialised within their family. It could be a mental health issue. Whatever it is, labelling people who are not as socially adept as us a 'creep' can play into a rather nasty side of our own nature, which may be designed from our evolutionary past to be suspicious of difference, rather than try to understand and work with that difference. Recent cases of 'creepy' but innocent men being beaten to death for being alleged child molesters is an extreme case of where people can go when they channel their fears/anxieties and jump to conclusions about men who seem a bit 'creepy'. Your focus on males is also interesting (I understand your research indicated the label was more common in referring to males) but women who were different during the middle ages were labelled as witches with equally unfortunate results (Salem Witch trials for example) which reflect a similar human reaction to people who are different. After all of the research your advice seemed a bit limp. I realise that the article is a little light hearted but if all you can say is that these people may need a bit of nurturing - what was the point of the article? It might have been more helpful to explore our reactions, our tendency to label and to project our fears onto people who are often quite innocent with negative consequences for those people, Best Chris

Thanks (2)
By Mr_Lizard
08th Jun 2016 12:23

I think you just described at least 75% of my friends. Individually brilliant, quirky (not rich enough to be 'eccentric'...), not too concerned with the opinions of the mundanes, probably fall somewhere on the autism spectrum. None of them watch much TV, or follow sports, which blanks out so many casual conversations with people who do.

"He doggedly (and unsuccessfully) asks his female coworkers out to lunch, and he may work in IT. Even though you know very little about his private life, you just know that he engages in peculiar hobbies like taxidermy or collecting something."

What a nasty, snide, vicious statement. Apparently now 'collecting something' qualifies as a 'peculiar' hobby. And when did 'lacking social graces' become 'creep'? Yes, this may well be someone who doesn't have many female friends, and doesn't socialise very well - in what way does this make them a bad person; someone who you should be afraid of? Yes, a lot of geeks end up in IT - it is the perfect career for people with excellent problem-solving skills but who maybe aren't so hot on the personal skills. These are the same skills that many HR people take for granted because practically everyone they work with has the same core skillset, but couldn't compose a bit of SQL to save their life.

"The person is behaving in ways that make him unpredictable. Maybe he laughs too hard or at inappropriate times. Perhaps he stands too close to you, licks his lips a bit too frequently while speaking, or the eye contact is inappropriately intimate or distant."

Maybe some people need to man up and deal with the fact that we're not all perfect little androids in the workplace. Some people don't like making eye contact. Some people have been told to make eye contact, but don't realise that that doesn't mean a fixed unblinking stare. Some people's sense of humour is wired very differently from everybody else. These people were smart enough to get hired in the first place, and good enough to get through the interview. Nothing you're describing there is incurable, or unendurable. Might need a slightly more empathetic manager to have a chat about personal space, or body language, but we're not really off the charts here.

Also, do you not employ adults who can have these conversations for themselves?

"Hi , thanks for staying back after the meeting. I just wanted to say that I find it difficult to deal with you when you don't look at me as we're talking. How can I help you do this to improve our communication?"

How hard is that?

This article reeks of condescension and fear. We're not allowed to pick on people because of their gender, their sexuality or their ethnicity, so let's find a new group we can all pick on safely. Ooh, look, the weirdoes from IT - nobody likes them, right?

Utterly repellent.

Thanks (1)